Three years ago, a politician walked into a row with NatWest (LON: NWG) and walked out having toppled the CEO. Today the regulatory aftershock from that fight finally lands. From this morning, every UK bank — NatWest, HSBC (LON: HSBA), Lloyds (LON: LLOY), and every smaller lender plus payment service provider — must give customers 90 days’ notice before closing an account, deliver the reason in writing, and point them toward a formal appeal route. It’s a small-sounding tweak with an outsized backstory, and it changes the balance of power between you and your bank in ways the headlines won’t quite capture. Here’s what the new rules actually do, why they exist, and what changes for you from today.
What’s Actually Changing Today
It gives a customer real time to find an alternative provider, transfer direct debits, route payroll, and avoid the operational chaos that comes with sudden account closure.
The headline change: banks and payment service providers now have to give 90 days’ notice before terminating a payment service, up from the previous 60-day requirement. That extra month is the lever. It gives a customer real time to find an alternative provider, transfer direct debits, route payroll, and avoid the operational chaos that comes with sudden account closure.
The second piece is the written explanation requirement. Until today, banks could close an account with a vague boilerplate notice. From today, they must spell out the reason in writing — clear enough for the customer to understand what triggered the decision and decide whether to challenge it. That single change strips away the “we won’t tell you why” defence banks have leaned on for years.
Third — and arguably the most consequential — is the formal appeals route. Customers who believe an account was wrongly closed can take the case to the Financial Ombudsman Service. That’s a free, independent adjudicator with the power to order a bank to reverse a closure. It’s the difference between “we said no” and “an external referee gets to look at it.”
The Farage Effect — Why These Rules Exist
The reforms trace back to the summer of 2023. Reform Party leader Nigel Farage had his account at Coutts — the private bank within the NatWest Group — closed. NatWest initially briefed it as a routine commercial decision. Internal documents later showed the bank had categorised Farage as a “Politically Exposed Person” (PEP) and that political viewpoints had been part of the reasoning. The fallout was severe: NatWest CEO Alison Rose resigned within days, and a parliamentary firestorm followed about whether banks were quietly de-banking customers for political reasons.
That single case turned a sleepy regulatory area into front-page news. PEPs are individuals who hold public office and trigger extra due diligence under anti-money-laundering rules — but the bar for what counts as “exposed enough to terminate the account” had drifted. Reform Party voters, MPs across parties, and a wave of small business owners with their own quiet de-banking stories converged on the same point: the system needed customer protection, not just bank protection.
The cross-Atlantic context matters too. In January, Donald Trump publicly accused JP Morgan of “incorrect and inappropriate” discrimination, alleging America’s biggest bank stopped offering him services after the 6 January Capitol riots. De-banking went from niche fintech debate to live political issue on both sides of the pond — and the UK’s regulatory response is the first concrete change either jurisdiction has shipped.
What Banks Must Do Now (And What It Means For Customers)
Operationally, the new regime forces three changes inside every UK bank. Account-closure workflows need to extend the notice clock from 60 to 90 days. Closure letters need to carry a substantive written reason, not boilerplate. Internal systems must surface the FOS appeal route to customers and document any pushback. None of this is technically difficult — but it forces banks to be deliberate about every closure decision, knowing the customer can now drag them in front of an external referee.
For customers most affected by historic de-banking — small businesses in crypto, adult entertainment, gambling, certain religious organisations, journalists covering sensitive beats, and politically active individuals — the practical effect is a real shift. The “we won’t tell you why” wall comes down. The 90-day window means real planning time. The FOS pathway means a bank’s risk-aversion now carries a cost: a referral, a process, and the risk of being publicly overturned.
There are limits. Banks still have to comply with anti-money-laundering law, sanctions regimes, and PEP requirements. None of those go away. If a closure is genuinely driven by regulatory necessity, the FOS isn’t going to overturn it. The new rules are about the grey zone — the cases where banks were closing accounts on weak grounds and refusing to explain themselves. That zone just shrank.
What This Means For You
If you’re a personal customer of NatWest, HSBC, Lloyds or any UK bank: from today, an account closure can’t blindside you. You get 90 days, a written reason, and a free appeal. If you run a business — especially in any sector banks treat as “high risk” — the same protections apply, plus realistic time to set up alternative banking. If you hold shares in any of the big lenders, this is a modest compliance cost with zero meaningful P&L impact: not an investment story. And if you’ve been quietly de-banked in the last few years and never got a real explanation, the FOS is now a route worth considering for the older case too — though older closures sit in a regulatory grey area on retroactive applicability.
The Bottom Line
The reforms are modest in scope but symbolically large. For the first time, the UK has codified that customers have a right to know why their bank is dropping them, time to react, and an external referee to appeal to. Watch the FOS appeals data over the next twelve months for the real signal: if overturned closures spike, banks were over-using de-banking and now know it; if volumes stay flat, the old system was working largely as intended and the rules are an insurance policy. Either way, you’ve gained real recourse you didn’t have yesterday — use it if you ever need it.
Want more like this? Sign up to The MJBurrows Briefing—our free weekly newsletter delivered every Monday morning.
FAQ
What exactly is “de-banking”?
De-banking is when a bank closes an existing account or refuses to open a new one — usually citing internal regulatory restrictions rather than the customer doing anything wrong. It can hit individuals or businesses. Common triggers include perceived political risk, sector risk (crypto, adult entertainment, gambling), or thin compliance overhead from low-revenue accounts.
Do the new rules apply to existing customers or only new ones?
They apply to all UK customers from today onwards. Any closure notice issued from 28 April 2026 must follow the new 90-day timeline and written-reason requirement. Closures already in progress under the old 60-day rule should also default to the longer notice if the closure date hasn’t yet arrived — though banks will vary in how they handle the transition.
What’s a Politically Exposed Person (PEP) and why does it matter?
A PEP is anyone who holds public office, plus close family members and associates. Under anti-money-laundering law, banks must apply enhanced due diligence to PEP accounts — the rationale being that public officials have higher corruption risk. The Farage case revealed banks were stretching the PEP label to include people with political profiles even outside formal office, and using it as cover for closures.
How do I appeal to the Financial Ombudsman Service?
You complain to the bank first and give them 8 weeks to respond. If you’re dissatisfied with the response, you take the case to the Financial Ombudsman Service — it’s free for consumers and small businesses, the bank carries the cost. The Ombudsman can order the bank to reinstate the account, pay compensation, or both. Decisions are binding on the bank.
Could my bank still close my account for “no reason”?
Not under the new regime — the written-reason requirement makes that explicitly non-compliant. But the reason can be very general (e.g. “outside our risk appetite”) and that may still be hard to challenge. The substantive change is that you now have something on paper to take to the FOS — and the bank has to defend its reasoning to an external party. The “no reason” defence is gone.
Disclosure & Editorial Standards
MJBurrows is not authorised or regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). The content on this website — including articles, calculators, and tools — is for general informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute personal financial, investment, tax, or legal advice and does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or objectives.
Nothing on this site is a personal recommendation to buy, sell, hold, or otherwise deal in any financial product, asset, or service. You should always conduct your own research and seek advice from a qualified, FCA-regulated financial adviser before making any financial decisions.
Our calculators produce estimates based on simplified models using HMRC-published rates for the current tax year. They cannot account for every individual circumstance and should not be relied upon as exact figures. Tax rules and rates may change — verify current rates with HMRC or a qualified tax adviser.
Projections are not guarantees. Where our tools show future values (investment growth, pension projections, compound interest), these are hypothetical illustrations based on assumed growth rates. Past performance does not guarantee future results. The value of investments can go down as well as up.
Market data displayed on this site is provided by third-party sources including Twelve Data, Yahoo Finance, and CoinGecko. We do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of third-party data.
This content is designed for UK residents and reflects UK tax rules, thresholds, and legislation. It may not apply to other jurisdictions.
Using this website does not create a professional-client relationship of any kind. MJBurrows is not responsible for any financial loss, damage, or decision made based on the content presented. By using this site, you accept these terms.
This disclaimer may be updated from time to time without prior notice. Last reviewed: 23 April 2026.
MJBurrows is an independent UK personal finance publication, written and edited by Matthew Burrows. There is no parent company, no investor group, and no advertising sales team — decisions about what to cover and how to frame it are made by Matthew alone. Our full Editorial Policy sets out how the site operates in detail.
Commercial model. As of April 2026, MJBurrows generates no revenue. The site carries no display advertising, no affiliate links, no sponsored content, no paid product placements, and no pay-for-coverage arrangements. If this changes in future, it will be disclosed openly on the Editorial Policy page.
Sources. Articles and tools reference primary sources — HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC), gov.uk, the Bank of England, the Office for National Statistics (ONS), the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), Companies House, and UK government departmental publications (DWP, Treasury). Calculator data uses HMRC-published rates for the 2026/27 tax year. Market data (tickers, asset prices) is provided by Twelve Data, Yahoo Finance, and CoinGecko.
Verification. Every published article is fact-checked before going live. Numerical claims are traced to their primary source, quotes are checked against the original speaker or document, and calculator outputs are tested against HMRC worked examples. See our verification and accuracy policy for the full process.
Corrections. If you spot an error, please report it via the Corrections page. A three-tier severity system commits to specific response times:
- Tier 1 — Urgent (material reader harm, defamatory statements, regulatory or legal issues): acknowledged within 24 hours, page actioned within 24 hours, correction published within 48 hours of confirmation.
- Tier 2 — High (significant factual errors that misinform readers): acknowledged within 3 working days, correction published within 7 working days of confirmation.
- Tier 3 — Standard (minor factual errors, dated references, missing context): acknowledged within 7 working days, correction published at the next regular content review (within the quarter).
Significant corrections are logged on the public Corrections log.
Updates and review cadence. Calculators are reviewed at least quarterly, plus event-driven updates when HMRC publishes new rates (Budget, Autumn Statement, new tax year). Guides are reviewed at least twice a year, with major rewrites whenever underlying regulation changes. Tax-year-sensitive content is prioritised for review at the April tax-year transition.
Get in touch. For editorial enquiries — corrections, story tips, reader questions — the address is contact@mjburrows.com. The contact page is at mjburrows.com/contact. Every email is read personally by Matthew.
