Rachel Reeves and Goldman Sachs Team Up to Save London’s IPO Market

News headline about Rachel Reeves and Goldman Sachs, overlaid with a picture of London, published by MJB.

Can London Win Back Its IPO Crown?

London’s stock market has seen better days. Once a go-to venue for company listings, the LSE now watches from the sidelines as rivals hoover up deals. Chancellor Rachel Reeves isn’t having it. She’s rolling out the red carpet for potential IPO candidatesโ€”and she’s brought Goldman Sachs along for backup. On Monday, Reeves and City Minister Lucy Rugby will host a closed-door roundtable with company bosses to discuss why they should choose London. It’s part pitch, part therapy session for a market that desperately needs both.


Goldman Sachs Gets a Front-Row Seat

Here’s where it gets interesting. Anthony Gutman, one of Goldman’s top dogs in Europe, will give “an overview of the market environment” at the meeting. Translation? A Wall Street heavyweight is effectively co-pitching London alongside UK ministers.

One City competitor called the setup “highly unusual”โ€”and they’re not wrong. Goldman doesn’t typically offer free market briefings to IPO hopefuls while sitting next to government officials. But desperate times call for creative tactics. Gutman’s CV speaks for itself: he’s worked on some of the UK’s biggest deals and knows the IPO game inside out.

The Treasury’s keeping the guest list under wraps for “commercial confidentiality,” but you can bet these are companies weighing their listing options right now.

Rachel Reeves and Goldman Sachs Team Up to Save London 8217 s IPO Market โ€” illustration 1

Why London’s IPO Scene Needs CPR

Let’s be blunt: London’s fallen behind. The invitation itself admits that attracting listings is a “high priority for the government.” That’s bureaucrat-speak for “we’re in trouble.”

Recent bright spots include Beauty Tech Group, Princes (yes, the tinned tuna people), and Shawbrook Group all eyeing London IPOs. But a few deals don’t reverse a trend. International rivals are eating London’s lunch when it comes to IPO proceeds, and companies are increasingly asking: why bother with the LSE?

The government’s rolled out reforms to boost capital market competitiveness, but the jury’s still out on whether they’ll move the needle.


The Stamp Duty Elephant in the Room

Word on the street? Reeves might address stamp duty exemptions for newly listed shares. Treasury officials have reportedly been mulling it over, and City bigwigs are pushing hard for action.

Andrew Bresler, CEO of Saxo UK stated: “Stamp duty on share trading should be abolished across the board if the UK is serious about revitalising its capital markets.”

His point? The UK’s practically alone in charging this levy. Most international markets ditched it ages ago. If London wants to compete with New York, Amsterdam, or Frankfurt, it needs to match their playbookโ€”not handicap itself with outdated taxes that scare off investors and issuers alike.

Rachel Reeves and Goldman Sachs Team Up to Save London 8217 s IPO Market โ€” illustration 2

What Happens Next?

Monday’s meeting could be a turning pointโ€”or just another talking shop. If Reeves announces meaningful reforms (like axing stamp duty), it signals the government’s actually serious. If it’s all warm words and vague promises, expect more companies to list elsewhere.

The clock’s ticking. London’s reputation as a global financial hub depends on proving it can still attract the deals that matter.


Wrapping Up: London’s Make-or-Break Moment

The UK government knows its capital markets are struggling, and it’s pulling out all the stops to fix them. Partnering with Goldman Sachs to pitch London IPOs is boldโ€”maybe even desperate. But if Reeves delivers on reforms like stamp duty abolition, she might just convince companies that London’s still got game.

Want to keep tabs on UK capital markets? Bookmark this space for updates on IPO trends and policy shifts.


FAQ

Q1: Why is London struggling to attract IPOs?

A: Companies face stamp duty costs, regulatory uncertainty, and better incentives elsewhere. International rivals like New York and Amsterdam offer more attractive terms, making London a harder sell.

Q2: What is stamp duty on shares, and why does it matter?

A: It’s a 0.5% tax on UK share purchases. Critics say it deters investors and makes London less competitive since most global markets don’t charge similar levies.

Q3: Who is Anthony Gutman?

A: He’s a senior Goldman Sachs banker in Europe who’s worked on major UK deals. His presence at the government meeting signals serious intent to attract IPOs.

Q4: Are any companies planning London IPOs soon?

A: Yesโ€”Beauty Tech Group, Princes (tinned tuna), and Shawbrook Group have all announced IPO intentions recently, offering hope for a market revival.

Q5: Will abolishing stamp duty actually help?

A: City experts think so. Removing the tax would align London with international competitors and reduce barriers for both companies and investors. Whether the government acts remains to be seen.


MORE NEWS

Share
Disclosure & Editorial Standards
Legal Disclaimer

MJBurrows is not authorised or regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). The content on this website — including articles, calculators, and tools — is for general informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute personal financial, investment, tax, or legal advice and does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or objectives.

Nothing on this site is a personal recommendation to buy, sell, hold, or otherwise deal in any financial product, asset, or service. You should always conduct your own research and seek advice from a qualified, FCA-regulated financial adviser before making any financial decisions.

Our calculators produce estimates based on simplified models using HMRC-published rates for the current tax year. They cannot account for every individual circumstance and should not be relied upon as exact figures. Tax rules and rates may change — verify current rates with HMRC or a qualified tax adviser.

Projections are not guarantees. Where our tools show future values (investment growth, pension projections, compound interest), these are hypothetical illustrations based on assumed growth rates. Past performance does not guarantee future results. The value of investments can go down as well as up.

Market data displayed on this site is provided by third-party sources including Twelve Data, Yahoo Finance, and CoinGecko. We do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of third-party data.

This content is designed for UK residents and reflects UK tax rules, thresholds, and legislation. It may not apply to other jurisdictions.

Using this website does not create a professional-client relationship of any kind. MJBurrows is not responsible for any financial loss, damage, or decision made based on the content presented. By using this site, you accept these terms.

This disclaimer may be updated from time to time without prior notice. Last reviewed: 23 April 2026.

How We Work

MJBurrows is an independent UK personal finance publication, written and edited by Matthew Burrows. There is no parent company, no investor group, and no advertising sales team — decisions about what to cover and how to frame it are made by Matthew alone. Our full Editorial Policy sets out how the site operates in detail.

Commercial model. As of April 2026, MJBurrows generates no revenue. The site carries no display advertising, no affiliate links, no sponsored content, no paid product placements, and no pay-for-coverage arrangements. If this changes in future, it will be disclosed openly on the Editorial Policy page.

Sources. Articles and tools reference primary sources — HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC), gov.uk, the Bank of England, the Office for National Statistics (ONS), the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), Companies House, and UK government departmental publications (DWP, Treasury). Calculator data uses HMRC-published rates for the 2026/27 tax year. Market data (tickers, asset prices) is provided by Twelve Data, Yahoo Finance, and CoinGecko.

Verification. Every published article is fact-checked before going live. Numerical claims are traced to their primary source, quotes are checked against the original speaker or document, and calculator outputs are tested against HMRC worked examples. See our verification and accuracy policy for the full process.

Corrections. If you spot an error, please report it via the Corrections page. A three-tier severity system commits to specific response times:

  • Tier 1 — Urgent (material reader harm, defamatory statements, regulatory or legal issues): acknowledged within 24 hours, page actioned within 24 hours, correction published within 48 hours of confirmation.
  • Tier 2 — High (significant factual errors that misinform readers): acknowledged within 3 working days, correction published within 7 working days of confirmation.
  • Tier 3 — Standard (minor factual errors, dated references, missing context): acknowledged within 7 working days, correction published at the next regular content review (within the quarter).

Significant corrections are logged on the public Corrections log.

Updates and review cadence. Calculators are reviewed at least quarterly, plus event-driven updates when HMRC publishes new rates (Budget, Autumn Statement, new tax year). Guides are reviewed at least twice a year, with major rewrites whenever underlying regulation changes. Tax-year-sensitive content is prioritised for review at the April tax-year transition.

Get in touch. For editorial enquiries — corrections, story tips, reader questions — the address is contact@mjburrows.com. The contact page is at mjburrows.com/contact. Every email is read personally by Matthew.