Picture this: a 247-year-old British engineering firm that supplies parts to Boeing is gearing up for its stock market debut. The twist? It’s looking at Wall Street, not the City of London.
Leeds-based Doncasters Group is reportedly in talks with banks about a 2026 IPO in New York. If it happens, it’s yet another bruise for London’s struggling stock exchange—and a sign that even Britain’s oldest industrial names are losing faith in their home market.
Here’s why this matters, what’s driving the exodus, and what it means for London’s future as a financial hub.
Why Doncasters Is Choosing New York Over London
Founded in 1778 (yes, before the French Revolution), Doncasters isn’t your typical startup chasing Silicon Valley hype. This is old-school British manufacturing—precision metals and turbine blades for aerospace giants.
But here’s the kicker: less than 10% of its £585m revenue comes from the UK. About a third flows from the US. When your biggest customers and markets are American, listing in New York just makes sense.
The company, which employs around 3,000 people, posted pre-tax earnings of £81.6m in 2024. That’s solid performance, and it’s coming off a successful refinancing of $500m in debt facilities. Translation? Doncasters is in growth mode, not survival mode.
According to Bloomberg, no final decision has been made yet. But the fact they’re even exploring it speaks volumes about London’s current appeal—or lack thereof.
London’s Listings Crisis: The Numbers Don’t Lie
Let’s talk cold, hard stats. In the first nine months of 2025, the London Stock Exchange raised just £184m. Compare that to 2021, when it pulled in £17bn. That’s a 99% collapse.
Meanwhile, US markets raised roughly £40bn over the same period. London isn’t just losing—it’s being lapped.
The UK now ranks behind Sweden, Spain, Switzerland, Turkey, Poland, and Germany for IPO activity. It’s barely ahead of Greece and the Netherlands. For a city that once crowned itself Europe’s premier listing destination, that’s embarrassing.
Who Else Is Ditching London?
Doncasters would join a growing list of high-profile defectors:
- Wise: The fintech darling ditched its London listing in June for a primary US listing.
- AstraZeneca: Upgraded its US shares to a direct listing, citing better access to capital.
- Dozens of other firms eyeing dual listings or outright moves to New York or Nasdaq.
The pattern is clear. British companies want deeper liquidity, higher valuations, and access to Wall Street’s massive investor base. London? It’s become the backup plan.
What’s Wrong With London?
It’s not just one thing—it’s death by a thousand cuts.
Shallow liquidity. London’s investor pool is smaller and less active than New York’s. Companies worry their shares won’t trade as heavily, which can depress valuations.
Regulatory headwinds. Brexit added complexity. Post-2021 reforms haven’t done enough to make London competitive again.
Valuation gap. US-listed companies often trade at higher multiples than their London counterparts. For founders and investors, that premium is hard to ignore.
Even Europe’s struggling. Sweden is the only EU country to raise more than £1bn in IPOs this year. The continent-wide drought suggests this isn’t just a London problem—but London’s taking it the hardest.
What Happens Next?
Doncasters hasn’t made a final call yet. But if it goes ahead with a New York IPO, expect more British firms to follow suit. The snowball effect is real.
For London, the stakes are existential. Losing IPOs means losing fees, jobs, and prestige. It also weakens the City’s role as Europe’s financial capital—a position it’s held for decades.
Policymakers are scrambling. There’s talk of reforming listing rules, cutting red tape, and sweetening tax incentives. But talk is cheap. Companies want results, and right now, New York’s delivering them.
Bottom line: Unless London can prove it’s still a world-class venue for going public, expect the exodus to continue. Doncasters might be 247 years old, but it’s not about to let nostalgia dictate its future.
FAQ: Doncasters and the London Listings Drought
Q1: Why is Doncasters considering a New York IPO instead of London?
A: Doncasters generates less than 10% of its revenue from the UK, while about a third comes from the US. Listing in New York gives it better access to American investors and deeper capital markets where its customer base is concentrated.
Q2: How bad is London’s IPO market right now?
A: Pretty grim. London raised just £184m in the first nine months of 2025, down from £17bn in 2021. Meanwhile, US markets raised around £40bn over the same period, making 2025 London’s worst year for listings in over three decades.
Q3: Which other British companies have moved away from London?
A: Fintech firm Wise switched to a primary US listing in June. Pharma giant AstraZeneca upgraded its US shares to a direct listing to access broader capital pools. Several other firms are eyeing similar moves.
Q4: What’s causing London’s listings crisis?
A: It’s a mix of shallow liquidity, lower valuations compared to the US, regulatory complexity post-Brexit, and a general lack of investor appetite. Companies simply get better terms and more attention in New York.
Q5: Can London recover from this exodus?
A: Possibly, but it’ll take serious reform. London needs to streamline regulations, attract more institutional investors, and offer compelling reasons for companies to stay. Right now, the momentum is all pointing west across the Atlantic.
DISCLAIMER
Effective Date: 15th July 2025
The information provided on this website is for informational and educational purposes only and reflects the personal opinions of the author(s). It is not intended as financial, investment, tax, or legal advice.
We are not certified financial advisers. None of the content on this website constitutes a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any financial product, asset, or service. You should not rely on any information provided here to make financial decisions.
We strongly recommend that you:
- Conduct your own research and due diligence
- Consult with a qualified financial adviser or professional before making any investment or financial decisions
While we strive to ensure that all information is accurate and up to date, we make no guarantees about the completeness, reliability, or suitability of any content on this site.
By using this website, you acknowledge and agree that we are not responsible for any financial loss, damage, or decisions made based on the content presented.
MORE NEWS
Disclosure & Editorial Standards
MJBurrows is not authorised or regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). The content on this website — including articles, calculators, and tools — is for general informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute personal financial, investment, tax, or legal advice and does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or objectives.
Nothing on this site is a personal recommendation to buy, sell, hold, or otherwise deal in any financial product, asset, or service. You should always conduct your own research and seek advice from a qualified, FCA-regulated financial adviser before making any financial decisions.
Our calculators produce estimates based on simplified models using HMRC-published rates for the current tax year. They cannot account for every individual circumstance and should not be relied upon as exact figures. Tax rules and rates may change — verify current rates with HMRC or a qualified tax adviser.
Projections are not guarantees. Where our tools show future values (investment growth, pension projections, compound interest), these are hypothetical illustrations based on assumed growth rates. Past performance does not guarantee future results. The value of investments can go down as well as up.
Market data displayed on this site is provided by third-party sources including Twelve Data, Yahoo Finance, and CoinGecko. We do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of third-party data.
This content is designed for UK residents and reflects UK tax rules, thresholds, and legislation. It may not apply to other jurisdictions.
Using this website does not create a professional-client relationship of any kind. MJBurrows is not responsible for any financial loss, damage, or decision made based on the content presented. By using this site, you accept these terms.
This disclaimer may be updated from time to time without prior notice. Last reviewed: 23 April 2026.
MJBurrows is an independent UK personal finance publication, written and edited by Matthew Burrows. There is no parent company, no investor group, and no advertising sales team — decisions about what to cover and how to frame it are made by Matthew alone. Our full Editorial Policy sets out how the site operates in detail.
Commercial model. As of April 2026, MJBurrows generates no revenue. The site carries no display advertising, no affiliate links, no sponsored content, no paid product placements, and no pay-for-coverage arrangements. If this changes in future, it will be disclosed openly on the Editorial Policy page.
Sources. Articles and tools reference primary sources — HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC), gov.uk, the Bank of England, the Office for National Statistics (ONS), the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), Companies House, and UK government departmental publications (DWP, Treasury). Calculator data uses HMRC-published rates for the 2026/27 tax year. Market data (tickers, asset prices) is provided by Twelve Data, Yahoo Finance, and CoinGecko.
Verification. Every published article is fact-checked before going live. Numerical claims are traced to their primary source, quotes are checked against the original speaker or document, and calculator outputs are tested against HMRC worked examples. See our verification and accuracy policy for the full process.
Corrections. If you spot an error, please report it via the Corrections page. A three-tier severity system commits to specific response times:
- Tier 1 — Urgent (material reader harm, defamatory statements, regulatory or legal issues): acknowledged within 24 hours, page actioned within 24 hours, correction published within 48 hours of confirmation.
- Tier 2 — High (significant factual errors that misinform readers): acknowledged within 3 working days, correction published within 7 working days of confirmation.
- Tier 3 — Standard (minor factual errors, dated references, missing context): acknowledged within 7 working days, correction published at the next regular content review (within the quarter).
Significant corrections are logged on the public Corrections log.
Updates and review cadence. Calculators are reviewed at least quarterly, plus event-driven updates when HMRC publishes new rates (Budget, Autumn Statement, new tax year). Guides are reviewed at least twice a year, with major rewrites whenever underlying regulation changes. Tax-year-sensitive content is prioritised for review at the April tax-year transition.
Get in touch. For editorial enquiries — corrections, story tips, reader questions — the address is contact@mjburrows.com. The contact page is at mjburrows.com/contact. Every email is read personally by Matthew.
