Aston Martin F1 Bleeds £190m Over Five Years Despite Revenue Growth

News headline about Aston Martin F1, overlaid with a picture of an Aston Martin F1 car, published by MJB.

The Numbers Are Not Pretty

Aston Martin F1 just posted another annual loss of £46m, bringing their five-year deficit to a staggering £190m. That’s nearly two hundred million quid gone, despite revenue climbing 16% in 2024. Lawrence Stroll’s racing dream? Expensive. Really expensive. Here’s why the team’s financials look more crash than podium, and what it means for their future on the grid.

Five Years, Five Losses — The Financial Skid Continues

Let’s break down Aston Martin F1’s losing streak. Since 2020, the team hasn’t posted a single profitable year:

  • 2020: £17.73m loss
  • 2021: Undisclosed but part of the pattern
  • 2022: £52.92m loss (their worst year)
  • 2023: Part of the cumulative total
  • 2024: £46m loss

Add it all up? £189m in losses across five consecutive years. That’s the kind of money that could buy you several supercars. Or, you know, fund an F1 team that keeps bleeding cash.

Aston Martin F1 Bleeds 190m Over Five Years Despite Revenue Growth — illustration 1
Revenue’s Up — So Why the Red Ink?

Aston Martin F1’s revenue hit £281m in 2024, good for fourth-highest in the paddock. They’re only trailing Mercedes, McLaren, and Red Bull. “New partnerships” helped push that 16% revenue bump, according to the accounts.

So what’s the problem? Cost of sales rose too. Running an F1 team isn’t cheap, especially when you’re chasing the big boys. The team’s spending to compete, but the wins aren’t following the wallet.

The Adrian Newey Effect — £20m Per Season

Speaking of spending, the 2024 financials don’t even include Adrian Newey’s salary. The design legend jumped ship from Red Bull and started with Aston Martin in March 2025. His reported pay? £20m per season.

That’s a massive bet on one person to turn the ship around. Newey’s track record speaks for itself, but paying superstar wages while posting eight-figure losses? Bold strategy, Lawrence.

A £2.4bn Valuation Despite the Losses

Despite the financial carnage, Aston Martin F1 was valued at £2.4bn ($3.3bn) in 2024 after parent company Aston Martin Lagonda sold a minority stake for £100m to an unnamed buyer.

That valuation came before McLaren’s eye-watering $5bn price tag in autumn 2025, when Bahrain’s sovereign wealth fund and UAE-based CYVN Holdings bought out minority investors.

F1 teams are expensive, sure. But they’re also valuable assets in a booming sport. The question: can Aston Martin translate that paper value into actual on-track success?

Aston Martin F1 Bleeds 190m Over Five Years Despite Revenue Growth — illustration 2

2025 Performance — Dead Last When It Counts

The financial pain matches the racing reality. Aston Martin sits seventh in the 2025 constructors’ championship without a single win or podium.

Fernando Alonso (12th, 37 points) and Lance Stroll (13th, 32 points) are nowhere near the sharp end. Compare that to championship leader Oscar Piastri’s 346 points, or McLaren’s dominant 678-point haul that sealed the constructors’ title.

You can spend all the money you want, but if the car’s not quick, you’re just burning cash in style.

What’s Next for Aston Martin F1?

The team’s banking on Newey’s magic to reverse their fortunes. They’ve got the revenue, the backing, and now one of F1’s greatest minds. But five years of losses and a seventh-place finish suggest the turnaround won’t happen overnight.

Can they climb back to the podium? Maybe. Will they need to spend even more to get there? Almost certainly.

Want to stay updated on F1’s biggest money moves? Keep an eye on team valuations, driver salaries, and how Lawrence Stroll’s billion-pound gamble plays out.


FAQ

Q1: Why is Aston Martin F1 losing so much money?

A: High operating costs, including salaries, development, and racing expenses, are outpacing revenue growth. Despite earning £281m in 2024, cost of sales rose significantly, leading to continued losses.

Q2: How much is Adrian Newey being paid by Aston Martin?

A: Adrian Newey reportedly earns £20m per season after joining from Red Bull in March 2025. His salary wasn’t included in the 2024 financial accounts.

Q3: What’s Aston Martin F1’s valuation despite the losses?

A: The team was valued at £2.4bn ($3.3bn) in 2024 when Aston Martin Lagonda sold a minority stake. F1 teams remain valuable assets even when unprofitable due to the sport’s global growth.

Q4: How does Aston Martin F1’s revenue compare to other teams?

A: With £281m in turnover, Aston Martin ranks fourth in the paddock behind Mercedes, McLaren, and Red Bull. Their revenue grew 16% in 2024 thanks to new partnerships.

Q5: Are Aston Martin F1 competitive in 2025?

A: No. The team sits seventh in the constructors’ championship with zero wins or podiums. Fernando Alonso and Lance Stroll have combined for just 69 points compared to McLaren’s championship-winning 678.


MORE NEWS

Share
Disclosure & Editorial Standards
Legal Disclaimer

MJBurrows is not authorised or regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). The content on this website — including articles, calculators, and tools — is for general informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute personal financial, investment, tax, or legal advice and does not take into account your individual circumstances, financial situation, or objectives.

Nothing on this site is a personal recommendation to buy, sell, hold, or otherwise deal in any financial product, asset, or service. You should always conduct your own research and seek advice from a qualified, FCA-regulated financial adviser before making any financial decisions.

Our calculators produce estimates based on simplified models using HMRC-published rates for the current tax year. They cannot account for every individual circumstance and should not be relied upon as exact figures. Tax rules and rates may change — verify current rates with HMRC or a qualified tax adviser.

Projections are not guarantees. Where our tools show future values (investment growth, pension projections, compound interest), these are hypothetical illustrations based on assumed growth rates. Past performance does not guarantee future results. The value of investments can go down as well as up.

Market data displayed on this site is provided by third-party sources including Twelve Data, Yahoo Finance, and CoinGecko. We do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of third-party data.

This content is designed for UK residents and reflects UK tax rules, thresholds, and legislation. It may not apply to other jurisdictions.

Using this website does not create a professional-client relationship of any kind. MJBurrows is not responsible for any financial loss, damage, or decision made based on the content presented. By using this site, you accept these terms.

This disclaimer may be updated from time to time without prior notice. Last reviewed: 23 April 2026.

How We Work

MJBurrows is an independent UK personal finance publication, written and edited by Matthew Burrows. There is no parent company, no investor group, and no advertising sales team — decisions about what to cover and how to frame it are made by Matthew alone. Our full Editorial Policy sets out how the site operates in detail.

Commercial model. As of April 2026, MJBurrows generates no revenue. The site carries no display advertising, no affiliate links, no sponsored content, no paid product placements, and no pay-for-coverage arrangements. If this changes in future, it will be disclosed openly on the Editorial Policy page.

Sources. Articles and tools reference primary sources — HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC), gov.uk, the Bank of England, the Office for National Statistics (ONS), the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), Companies House, and UK government departmental publications (DWP, Treasury). Calculator data uses HMRC-published rates for the 2026/27 tax year. Market data (tickers, asset prices) is provided by Twelve Data, Yahoo Finance, and CoinGecko.

Verification. Every published article is fact-checked before going live. Numerical claims are traced to their primary source, quotes are checked against the original speaker or document, and calculator outputs are tested against HMRC worked examples. See our verification and accuracy policy for the full process.

Corrections. If you spot an error, please report it via the Corrections page. A three-tier severity system commits to specific response times:

  • Tier 1 — Urgent (material reader harm, defamatory statements, regulatory or legal issues): acknowledged within 24 hours, page actioned within 24 hours, correction published within 48 hours of confirmation.
  • Tier 2 — High (significant factual errors that misinform readers): acknowledged within 3 working days, correction published within 7 working days of confirmation.
  • Tier 3 — Standard (minor factual errors, dated references, missing context): acknowledged within 7 working days, correction published at the next regular content review (within the quarter).

Significant corrections are logged on the public Corrections log.

Updates and review cadence. Calculators are reviewed at least quarterly, plus event-driven updates when HMRC publishes new rates (Budget, Autumn Statement, new tax year). Guides are reviewed at least twice a year, with major rewrites whenever underlying regulation changes. Tax-year-sensitive content is prioritised for review at the April tax-year transition.

Get in touch. For editorial enquiries — corrections, story tips, reader questions — the address is contact@mjburrows.com. The contact page is at mjburrows.com/contact. Every email is read personally by Matthew.