News headline about Rachel Reeves pushing British products overlaid with the Union flag, published by MJB.

Remember when “buying local” was just a feel-good slogan? With UK employment sliding and unemployment hitting a four-year high of 4.7%, Rachel Reeves is telling government departments to prioritise British jobs in public contracts.

The timing’s telling – someone needs to take the wheel before this economic slide gets worse.

The Cabinet Memo That’s Got Everyone Talking

Reeves and Pat McFadden (Chancellor to the Duchy of Lancaster – yes, that’s a real job) fired off a letter to cabinet ministers with a simple message: make every government pound work for British workers.

Their game plan? Use the billions spent on transport and infrastructure projects as a jobs creation machine. They want departments to “ensure the creation of British jobs, productivity-enhancing opportunities, and skills are prioritised in every major contract.”

Translation: if you’re bidding for government work, you better show how you’ll boost UK employment.

Small Firms Get a Lifeline

The duo also wants more spending funneled to smaller companies. Makes sense – these firms often struggle to compete against established giants who’ve mastered the art of winning government contracts while their coffee’s still hot.

“Every department needs to be pulling this procurement lever to support economic growth,” they wrote. It’s like turning government spending into a Swiss Army knife for job creation.

The Numbers Don’t Lie (And They’re Not Pretty)

Here’s where things get uncomfortable. The Office for National Statistics just released some brutal figures:

  • 41,000 jobs vanished from payrolls in June alone
  • 178,000 people lost work over the year to June
  • Unemployment rate climbed to 4.7% – the highest in four years

Economists are pointing fingers at Reeves’ £20bn tax raid from her Autumn Budget. Companies faced with higher costs did what companies do – they cut jobs and raised prices. Inflation? Up 3.6% year-on-year.

It’s like watching a slow-motion economic domino effect.

When Growth Goes in Reverse

Remember all that talk about economic growth? Yeah, about that. The UK economy actually shrank 0.1% in June when economists expected it to grow. This followed April’s 0.3% contraction.

Reeves’ growth agenda isn’t just stalling – it’s running backwards. That’s got to sting when your whole political brand is built on being the “growth Chancellor.”

The Procurement Revolution

McFadden’s pushing for an overhaul of public procurement rules that would let government bodies prioritise companies proving they’ll create British jobs. Think of it as affirmative action for employment.

This applies to major transport projects, hospital construction, school building – basically anywhere the government writes big checks. And before you ask, yes, this can be done within existing trade agreements. Other countries already do it.

What This Actually Means

This isn’t just political theatre. When you’re haemorrhaging jobs and growth is flatlining, government procurement becomes one of the few levers left to pull. It’s economic jujitsu – using the government’s buying power to create the jobs the private sector isn’t delivering.

The Bottom Line

Reeves is betting big on government spending to fix what her tax hikes broke. With unemployment climbing and growth in reverse, this procurement push could be a lifeline for British workers. Whether it works fast enough to stop the economic slide remains the £20bn question.

Want to stay ahead of UK economic policy changes? Keep watching how this procurement overhaul plays out – it could reshape how government contracts work for years to come.


FAQ

Q1: Is this “Buy British” policy legal under international trade rules? 

A: Yes, according to Reeves and McFadden. They specifically noted this can be done “within our trade agreements, as other countries do.” The key is structuring contracts to prioritise job creation rather than explicitly excluding foreign companies.

Q2: How much government spending are we talking about? 

A: The letter mentions “billions in public spending on transport and infrastructure projects.” While exact figures weren’t specified, UK government procurement typically runs into tens of billions annually across all departments.

Q3: Will this actually create jobs given the current economic climate? 

A: That remains to be seen. With 178,000 jobs lost in the past year and companies still adjusting to tax increases, even prioritising British jobs in contracts might not offset broader economic headwinds.

Q4: What types of projects will be affected? 

A: Major transport projects, hospital construction, school building, and other large infrastructure schemes. Essentially any significant government contract where job creation can be measured and prioritised.

Q5: How quickly could we see results from this policy? 

A: Government contracts often take months to negotiate and award, then more time to create actual jobs. Don’t expect immediate relief from current unemployment figures, but impacts could be visible within 6-12 months.


MORE NEWS